Un estudio de la Universidad de California en San Diego (Estados Unidos) ha revelado que los medicamentos para combatir la acidez estomacal pueden alterar determinadas bacterias intestinales y promover lesiones en el hígado que avancen hacia una enfermedad hepática crónica. Así se desprende de los resultados de un estudio, cuyos resultados publica la revista Nature Communications, que evaluó en ratones y humanos el impacto que tienen los inhibidores de la bomba de protones, un tipo de fármacos ampliamente consumidos por hasta el 10 por ciento de la población, y de los que el más conocido es el principio activo omeprazol.
En concreto, han visto que la supresión del ácido gástrico promueve el crecimiento de la bacteria 'Enterococcus' en el intestino y su desplazamiento al hígado, donde favorece la inflamación y el empeoramiento de la enfermedad hepática crónica.
En cada uno de los tres modelos bloquearon la producción de ácido gástrico por ingeniería genética o mediante omeprazol, y secuenciaron genes específicos de microbios obtenidos a partir de las heces de los animales, a fin de determinar su microbiota intestinal en cada caso.
To determine the effect of gastric acid suppression on the progression of chronic liver disease, Schnabl’s team looked at mouse models that mimic alcoholic liver disease, NAFLD and NASH in humans. In each, they blocked gastric acid production either by genetic engineering or with a PPI (omeprazole/Prilosec). They sequenced microbe-specific genes collected from the animals’ stool to determine the gut microbiome makeup of each mouse type, with or without blocked gastric acid production.
The researchers found that mice with gastric acid suppression developed alterations in their gut microbiomes. Specifically, they had more Enterococcus species of bacteria. These changes promoted liver inflammation and liver injury, increasing the progression of all three types of liver disease in the mice: alcohol-induced liver disease, NAFLD and NASH.
To confirm it was the increased Enterococcus that exacerbated chronic liver disease, Schnabl’s team also colonized mice with the common gut bacteria Enterococcus faecalis to mimic the overgrowth of intestinal enterococci they had observed following gastric acid suppression. They found that increased Enterococcus alone was sufficient to induce mild steatosis and increase alcohol-induced liver disease in mice.
The team also examined the link between PPI usage and alcoholic liver disease among people who abuse alcohol. They analyzed a cohort of 4,830 patients with a diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse — 1,024 (21 percent) were active PPI users, 745 (15 percent) were previous users and 3061 (63 percent) had never used PPIs.
The researchers noted that PPI intake among these patients increased stool concentrations of Enterococcus. What’s more, the 10-year risk of a diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease was 20.7 percent for active users of PPIs, 16.1 percent for previous users and 12.4 percent for never users. In other words, the rate of liver disease in people who chronically abuse alcohol was 8.3 percent higher for those who actively use PPIs compared to those who never used the acid-blocking medications.
The researchers concluded that there is an association between PPI use among people who abuse alcohol and risk of liver disease. However, they can’t yet rule out the possibility that there could be other unidentified factors that differ between patients that do and do not take PPIs, which might confound the relationship between PPI use and liver disease.
While this study relies upon mouse models and a patient database, and a large, randomized, controlled clinical trial would be needed to definitively show causality between PPI usage and risk of chronic liver disease in humans, Schnabl said the initial data should at least get people thinking about reducing their use of PPIs in cases where they aren’t a necessity.
There are inexpensive and readily available alternatives to PPIs. However, even non-PPI-based antacids (e.g., Pepto-Bismol, Tums, or H2 blockers such as Tagamet and Zantac) still suppress gastric acid to a lesser degree. While these other types of antacids were not tested in this study, Schnabl said any medication that suppresses gastric acid effectively could cause changes in gut bacteria and thus potentially affect the progression of chronic liver disease. Alternatively, non-pharmacological methods for managing heartburn are an option for some patients, including losing weight and reducing intake of alcohol, caffeine, and fatty and spicy foods.
“Our findings indicate that the recent rise in use of gastric acid-suppressing medications might have contributed to the increased incidence of chronic liver disease,” Schnabl said. “Although obesity and alcohol use predispose a person to acid reflux requiring antacid medication, many patients with chronic liver disease take gastric acid suppressive medications without appropriate indication. We believe clinicians should consider withholding medications that suppress gastric acid unless there is a strong medical indication.”
This new information might also provide a new therapeutic avenue researchers could explore as a means to reduce risk of liver injury in some people.
“We might someday be able to manipulate the gut microbiome, and in particular Enterococcus faecalis, to attenuate alcohol-related liver disease associated with gastric acid suppression,” Schnabl said.
Co-authors of this study include: Cristina Llorente, Lirui Wang, Samuel B. Ho, UC San Diego and VA San Diego Healthcare System; Peter Jepsen, Henrik T. Sørensen, Hendrik Vilstrup, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Tatsuo Inamine, UC San Diego and Nagasaki University; Sena Bluemel, Hui J. Wang, Rohit Loomba, Jun Xu, Tatiana Kisseleva, Xin Du, David A. Brenner, UC San Diego; Jasmohan S. Bajaj, Mitchell L. Schubert, Virginia Commonwealth University and McGuire VA Medical Center; Masoumeh Sikaroodi, Patrick M. Gillevet, George Mason University; Jessica DePew, Karen E. Nelson, and Derrick E. Fouts, J. Craig Venter Institute.
This research was funded, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AA020703, U01 AA021856, U01AA24726, R01DK089713), Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development, VA Merit review and Swiss National Foundation.